Political Parties and the Electorial Process Assignment

Political Parties and the Electorial Process - appellative ExampleOn the other hand, Democrats have raiseed interventions that intervene closely on the lives of individuals in a manner that may be seen to alter local authority (Peress, 2011). On economy, republicans favor a form _or_ system of government of free enterprise where the government only encourages a free business environment. They focus on permit the people act independently within a free market with little government interference. For example, Republican policy may not so easily favor bailing out an enterprise that is facing monetary woes. Democrats on their part, Democrats hold that the economy is a sensitive area that the government should monitor closely. They tend to favor government support of economic institutions in the event they are threatened with issues of performance. For example, the Obama administration bailed out carrefour Company to save millions of jobs for Americans. The other difference between R epublicans and Democrats ideologies is that whereas Republicans favor limited government spending, Democrats believe in federal tax control. Democrats hold that it is the business of the federal government to design tax policies and regulations. Republicans do not agree with this position, favoring controlled government spending and tax increases. ... On the other hand, Democrats have favored a controlled force spending. Even so, the current administration was not keen on that. It could be probably because of terror threat, which has been a serious issue in the last 10 years (Peress, 2011). Analyze Key Reasons Why trio Parties Have Ever Been Successful At the Presidential Level The nature of party system in the US is such that representatives are first elected at dominion level. Election at the district level is such that only one candidate with the most votes is declared the winner. This system has seen many candidates from triplet parties who lose at the district level since t he major parties are usually out to make the go around out of the districts elections. One can say that the level of political competition that the district level explains why it has always been difficult for third parties to be successful. Besides, the fact that there has been the trend that majorities of the electorates identify with the toughger parties has as well as posed a political challenge for candidates who prefer to run on third parties. It is a attention or concern of the psychological power of the big two parties on the minds of the electorates (Snyder and Ting, 2011). Besides, there is no big historical success for third parties. Probably Roosevelt was the only lucky candidate of third parties when he scooped 88% of the Electoral College votes, but he also reversed and joined the Republican Party. Therefore, it appears that history does not shell out third parties a fair share of the competitive platform against Democrats and Republicans. They may be seen as polit ical underdogs who cannot bark so loudly enough on matters of interest to the electorates. Lastly, third parties have also suffered the bollix of