Thursday, March 14, 2019
School Nutrition: When Capitalism Causes Obesity Essay -- Nutrition
A dollop of tomato paste - that is all that this is unavoidable for an other-wise high-sodium, high-fat, and high-grease food product to be labeled as a vegetable as voted by a lobbyist-controlled congress in November of 2011. Pizza, as it turns out, is straight off considered a vegetable by school nutrition standards (A veg Pizza). It is obvious, then, that such as decision was not perpetuated nor endorsed by activists run for proper nutrition within in the school cafeteria. It was lobbyists, near in all likelihood independent or large craft caterers, who gave the decision the political and pecuniary boost it needed. But by allowing congress to make decisions based on lobbyist endorsement, pressure, and financial supports such as this one, the States is simultaneously over-feeding its children, depriving its children of key nutrients, and establishing an epiphytotic of obesity. The blame, however, lies not just within the schools, parents, congress, or society, but upon a conglomeration of these things. Surely, it would be folly to believe otherwise. One thing is clear Americas nutritional standards for school children must change.With this need for change in mind, citizens must no longer ignore the pressing empirical entropy of the detrimental state of Americas contemporary nutritional standards. Currently, most school cafeterias provide students nutritional needs by relying on processed foods (sugar, white flour, oil, artificial ingredients) and animal products whilst barely delivering any whole produce. In fact, most of the fruit-and-vegetable nutrition comes from byproducts such as juice concentrates or stocks. The dietetic Guidelines for Americans recommends decreasing saturated fats, sugar and sodium, while increasing whole grains, ... ...tion and to be consistent with what they are teaching to avoid hypocrisy. Students, when faced with nutrition education, result observe the hypocrisy, and conclude that nutrition is not important when ev erything they see close to them contradicts the message their teachers are trying to send. School administrators cannot, and most likely volition not, be willing to endorse this message if it is not cost-efficient. It is then up to society, congress, and the people of the U.S. to see nutrition and their children not as another business expense, but as the methods to create a standard of healthy children, irrespective of the financial impact. Works CitedSchool Meals Need to Get Healthier Report. Healthday. 29 OCT 2009 n. page. Web. 14 Dec. 2011.Shah, Nirvi. School-Meals Makeover Stirs The Pot. Education Week 30.27 (2011) 1,. ERIC. Web. 7 Dec. 2011.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment