Analytical Essay Super Size Me Essay

Welcome to At the Movies on ABC 1 and as usual Im your host, _______. Tonight well be reviewing the soci entirelyy overcritical 2004 documental, Super Size Me directed by and starring Morgan Spurlock. The film documents the 30 daytime period in which Morgan Spurlock ate three meals a day consisting of nothing but McDonalds whilst following these four rules he can completely eat things on sale, he must super size his meal if asked, he must eat everything on the menu at least once and lastly he must restrict himself to the average union of exercise, typical of the the Statesn population. It in addition documents the drastic effects this lifestyle has on Spurlocks physical and psychological, wellbeing, and explores the firm nutrient industrys incarnate influence, including how it encourages woeful nutrition for its own profit. I found this docudrama to be quite enjoyable and it was an overall quality film. Super Size Me was enjoyment to invite with its colourful graphics a nd catchy lyrics which drew the interview proximate and foc intentiond them on what Spurlock was representing.The documentary was effective in cr consume shock and evil within the earshot to further supporter the audience agree with and put up Spurlocks views. The narrative structure of Super Size Me was built roughly a central enigma, this being the obesity crisis facing the American people. The documentary follows a format, showing the audience Spurlock alimentation McDonalds aliment and then(prenominal) cutaneous senses sick because of it and then followed by footage of Spurlock perceive a specialist to state both Spurlock and the audience of the m whatever health risks this diet is inflicting on Spurlock. The documentary then proceeds to show much(prenominal) things as what instruct canteens ar serving kids at school. This is meant to shock the audience and specify them to believe what is occurrent to Spurlock and his health after eating steady food will also ha ppen to the kids who atomic number 18 eating unhealthy and processed meals at school every day. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) Spurlocks purpose in this documentary was to inform and position the audience to coincide his views on Americas obesity epidemic. pronounce AlsoAnalytical Essay TopicsThis was achieved through cunning and intelligent choices as to what was filmed and what was cut out. He had also employed a modus operandi of other techniques such as camera angles, shot composition, alter and knowledgeable use of music to accompany the visuals. Through these techniques Spurlock has effectively positioned the audience to play his views on Americas aforementioned obesity epidemic. Spurlock has positioned the audience to turn out a somewhat version of the truth as not all sides of the story are given a voice. The stylus in which Spurlock presents himself to the audience has also advisedly been altered to position the audience to coincide with the attitudes hes presenting throug hout the documentary. Spurlock measuredly wore relaxed clothing and spoke directly to the audience in order to position the audience to feel comfortable accept Spurlocks attitudes towards Americas obesity crisis. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE)To further position and help the audience connect with Spulock, he has introduced them to his fianc whos a vegan chef which will be in juxtaposition to the unhealthy food served by most fast food restaurants. These inclusions have positioned the audience to feel close and trusting of Spurlock so that his opinions could be accepted. The use of irony during this documentary has been used because if the audience finds something risible and therefore having a coercive reaction, they are more likely to accept what is being represented. The use of irony was used throughout the documentary in such scenes as when Spurlock was referring to his headaches, stomach aches and general sick feeling from the food as McHeadaches and a McTummy. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This positions the audience to react in a way which enables them to accept the Spurlocks view on how McDonalds is affecting his health and how its devising him generally sick.The audience is positioned to accept definite views without hearing or seeing the other sides of the argument. Spurlock has used bias by silencing or tarnishing the credibility of certain interviewees in interviews. When Spurlock interviews the CEO of McDonalds Australia, Guy Russo, the use of higher camera angles and editing positioned the audience to disagree and view what Guy Russo said damagingly which in turn has led to the audience viewing poorly of McDonalds even though they were not completely silenced. Spurlock has also positioned the audience to accept the opinions and beliefs of the three health check specialists who are monitoring Spulocks health throughout the experiment. The use of eye level camera angles positions the audience to feel equal with the specialists as they present their opinions and to immediately believe and accept what the specialists are saying repayable to the camera angles and their superior level of education within the medical discipline which once once more positions the audience to accept their attitudes.The included footage has also been deliberately used to further position the audience to accept Spurlocks views on Americas fast food industries and how their corporate profit is burden over the health of their consumers. Footage of the many advertisements and meals which are specifically positioned at kids were intentionally shown to position us to believe McDonalds is using these things to appeal to and lure the kids in. This then results in the audience being positioned to reflect poorly of McDonalds and their constant regard of profits which are put over the wellbeing of their customers. Frequent shots of Spurlock without a shirt have intentionally been included to show the weight he may or may not have gained as a result of his high fat in take diet. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This positions the audience to once again think poorly of McDonalds and the food they are serving as they are seeing the drastic effects that accompany Spurlocks heavy McDonalds diet. When the interviews amongst Spurlock and the three health experts took place, key terms where placed on the overwhelm so that they were imprinted into the viewers mind.These key terms included poor nutrition and especially Addiction which led the audience to believe how fast food is affecting the health of Spurlock and to view the companies behind the food negatively without taking into getation the amount of fast food he is eating and how a good deal its being eaten. The music and soundtrack within this documentary often complements the visuals, making it easier for the audience to accept the visuals or the lyrics of the complementing soundtrack. During the opening menu of the documentary and closing credits the Super Size Me song was played and the influence of the menu reflected the colours of the American flag. (INCLUDE FOOTAGE HERE) This song was co-written by Spurlock and included phrases such as Super size me the American way and everythings big in America.These lyrics were intentionally used as they position the audience to accept that the American culture is the result of the American fast food industries influence on the American society whether its a positive or negative influence. Overall the documentary was very enjoyable to watch and I found the footage rather shocking and attention grabbing at times. It was a very informative and eye opening documentary with a numerous number of techniques which position the audience to accept Spurlocks views on Americas thirst for profits which have sadly resulted in the pct of obese citizens growing at an alarming rate.However, the use of the included techniques and discriminating editing resulted in a documentary which lacked objectivity. This lack of objectivity effect the audiences pe rception of fast food companies and how they might consider an alternative choice when deciding to dine at McDonalds or any other fast food restaurant. Overall I gave this documentary, 3 out of 5 stars as it was enjoyable to watch but at times I felt as if I was being positioned and the exclusively experiment was over the top as someone coming from eating healthy vegan foods is obviously going to have a dramatically negative reaction to fatty fast foods, which is skewing the audiences perception of fast food companies.