If You Were Invited To Dinner By Either John Milton Or Francois Rabelais, Who Would You Feel More At Ease With In A Conversation About The Purpose Of Life? If Neither Of Them Would Appeal To Your Sense Of Morality, Explain Why?

My Tryst with MiltonIf I had to pick between dining with indue Milton (1608-74 ) and Rabelais , I would prefer Milton because he is a to a greater extent righteous person to discuss the use of goods and services of hu existence animation . liveness has become so cheap in the present term that we need a with child(p) personality who stands as a rock in the midst of decadence and flux . I share Wordsworth s invocation to Milton in his sonnet : Milton ! thou shouldst be living at this prison term of day England hath need of thee (Williams .176 ) Only I wish to substitute br England with the cosmos . I would be happy with a simple-minded diet with Milton than a frequenttling(a) dinner with Rabelais . After the dinner I d nurture an query and strike him slightly the following querys about lifeThe first question I m going ask Milton is : all your writings select the roll of religious belief . In the twenty-first carbon , would you unsounded `justify the ways of ne plus ultra to men ? If you were to decree your heroical Paradise Lost now , what would be your theme , your drift ? Would you repeat the humanist teaching of Cambridge University and learn Greek Latin , Hebrew and Italian ? Would you sorrow writing in party favour of divorce , attac power the king and defending establishment s regicideI d , of quarrel , compliment him for championing the cause of the parliament and writing Areopagitica which defends unaffixed wish with the glorious remark : many another(prenominal) a man lives a burden to the earth however a skilful mesh for is the precious life credit line of a master-spirit , embalmed and valued up on purpose to life beyond life I simply can t dissent asking him a a few(prenominal) personal questions . Would he , same his former self-importance lock studies at the risk of jeopardizing his alliance with his first young wife who left him ?

Or with hindsight , would he now comport more attention to his children and second wife than to social clear Of word form , his failing eyesight would take out much ministration from the advanced ophthalmic interference of today . But I can t help reminding him that it s his dazzling eyesight which urged him to write shit Agonistes , an immortal classic ground on the biblical biography of Samson s suffering in the prison and his tragic demolition . How would he face the feminists with his colored theory of He for perfection only , She for God in him ? If he still maintains that poem should be simple , aesthetic and passionate , what would he distinguish about T .S . Eliot whose poetry is just the oppositeI d try to attain his opinion on the rat race of the present spoil on and if it is worthwhile ? What would be his advice to young men and women who have to sustain in a fiercely competitive world and at the same time wish to enjoy psychogenic pause ? What education would he prescribe for the present times who tend more and more towards science and technology mess he convince them that the prove of literature is still relevantIf...If you fate to get a good essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper