Describe Aristotle's teaching about the differences between the final cause and the other causes and also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Aristotle's views on causality

Aristotle outlined cardinal serves that established the terminate purpose of an fix or action. They are as follows: the material defecate, the good bring on, the oaf cause and the nett cause. Aristotle believed that the final cause was different from the former(a) three causes and was the most important of the quartet-spot. Objects, whether they are recreate or non-living tend to absorb all four of the causes although it is non essential to confine all four. Actions only tend to sire a couple of causes: The efficient cause and the final cause. Aristotle believes that you rear end only truly see something when you dwell everything about it. As you learn more about an tendency you begin to hear it better. For moral when looking a picture it is useful to hump it was done by an artist, however, it is more useful to know a painter produced it, and even more useful to discover Picasso multicolour it as opposed to any other painter. Each of the four causes pract ice a why? head. Aristotle believed that to gain a carry through resolving we needed to know the answer to each of the four causes. only if not all objects will have four causes.

For example a universal triangle has a final cause that states its definition still it does not have an efficient cause as it does not come into being but it rigorously exists. Nor does it have a final cause and it does not have a goal or end. The material cause answered the question What is it made of? by defining the material. An example of an inanimate object could be a chair. Its material cause could be wood, glue, and nails. An ani mate object such as a put off would have fu! r, skin, organs and bones etc., as its material... If you want to charter a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper